(logo)
(navigation image)
Home Animation & Cartoons | Arts & Music | Computers & Technology | Cultural & Academic Films | Ephemeral Films | Movies | News & Public Affairs | Non-English Videos | Open Source Movies | Prelinger Archives | Spirituality & Religion | Sports Videos | Video Games | Vlogs | Youth Media

Search: Advanced Search

UploadAnonymous User (login or join us) 

View movie

[item image]
View thumbnails

Stream (help[help])

64Kb MPEG4 (dialup)
256Kb MPEG4 (broadband)

Play / Download (help[help])

(95 MB)64Kb MPEG4
(217 MB)256Kb MPEG4
(1 GB)MPEG1
(2 GB)MPEG2


All Files: HTTP
[Public Domain]

Resources

Bookmark
Report errors

Mel Welles & Aureliano Luppi (co-director)Lady Frankenstein (1971)

From IMDb:
When Dr. Frankenstein is killed by a monster he created, his daughter and his lab assistant Marshall continue his experiments. The two fall in love and attempt to transplant Marshall's brain in to the muscular body of a retarded servant Stephen, in order to prolong the aging Marshall's life. Meanwhile, the first monster seeks revenge on the grave robbers who sold the body parts used in its creation to Dr. Frankenstein. Soon it comes after Marshall and the doctor's daughter.


This movie is part of the collection: Sci-Fi / Horror

Director: Mel Welles & Aureliano Luppi (co-director)
Producer: Umberto Borsato
Audio/Visual: sound, color
Language: english
Keywords: Horror

Creative Commons license: Public Domain


Individual Files

Movie FilesMPEG2MPEG1256Kb MPEG464Kb MPEG4
Lady Frankenstein2 GB1 GB217 MB95 MB

Write a review
Downloaded 62,173 times
Reviews
Average Rating: [2.0 out of 5 stars]

Reviewer: human - [4.0 out of 5 stars] - June 10, 2008
Subject: Horror, sex and murder, what more could one ask?
To say this bears any relationship whatsoever with Mary Shelley's classic novel requires an incredibly thin stretching of the imagination, but if you sit back and enjoy it for what it is--an early '70s low-budget softcore Italian horror flick--it's rather enjoyable.

Reviewer: J-P Kinnear's Mills - [5.0 out of 5 stars] - January 25, 2008
Subject: Somehow a good exploitation movie!
It's very interesting to see how a movie that receive so many bad reviews is downloaded that much!

Yes, it is "bad" if you let yourself get stucked up with your first impression...
Take your time, there are clever stuff in this movie... It's weirdness factor when seen by our today's eyes make it quite satisfying for people in quest of such thrills. The different degree behind the motivation of the characters is good. At the End you ask yourself who's the true evil one. Don't close your mind because of cheesy skin, easy humor, so so acting. It is a highly enjoyable carricature of old horror movies...

The whole looks a lot like 70's adult sultry pulp fiction.

Withstanding all those bad reviews, I highly recommend this movie!!!

Reviewer: flickfdude - [1.0 out of 5 stars] - May 11, 2007
Subject: sound card blow outer
You have to turn the volumes of all the controles up as high as they go to hear this one and barely. The color is bad and the fear of a burnt out sound card is more demanding than the content of the film on ones attention. This is probably a waste of time to download deaspite its recent feature film publication date, (for Archive pages).

Reviewer: TheWolfGirl - [1.0 out of 5 stars] - May 10, 2007
Subject: Hideous from start to finish
The problems with this film are glaringly evident from the very first frame. Most obvious is the color, various shades of yellow have been used in place of white. In a few scenes the effect is a poor simulation of the sepia-tones of an old photograph. For the rest of the film, the bright yellow skin tones are simply nauseating.

The film was written an directed by Mel Wells, an actor who many will remember for his brilliant performance as the flower shop owner, Gravis Mushnik, in the camp classic, “Little Shop of Horrors” (1960). Unfortunately, Wells was both writer and directory of this stinker and most of its faults are likely his.

“Little Shop or Horrors” was a rare thing, a film that set out to be camp and pulled it off with great success. It would seem that Wells was trying for something similar with “Lady Frankenstein” (“La Figlia di Frankenstein”), but he failed miserably both as writer and director. Throughout the film I consistently found myself wondering why he had included some shots and excluded others. The editing was equally inexplicable. He seems constantly reaching out to make some momentous artistic statement, but it never comes. It is as if he understands the language of composition and montage used by others, but cannot use it to express himself. In the end I am left to conclude that perhaps he had nothing to say.

It is possible that not all the fault lies with Wells. This was apparently an Italian production and it reflects the curious Italian production and acting values of the 1960's and early ‘70's. Some of the script and acting issues are likely due to the film being dubbed from Italian to English. Other issues may well have been dictated by the studio and been beyond Wells’ control.

Reviewer: terracesider - [3.0 out of 5 stars] - January 30, 2007
Subject: Enjoyable rehash
Roslaba Neri, of whom I know nothing, is excellent as the eponymous female lead and the monster is well done. The rest of the cast, however, is no more than adequate.

All in all, a well told and enjoyable rehash of the Frankenstein story.

Reviewer: algonut - [3.0 out of 5 stars] - January 13, 2007
Subject: Lady Frankestein
I downloaded the MPEG-1 and converted to MPEG-2 with MAGIX program. The result is very good, and the downloading time very short.

Reviewer: billbarstad - [2.0 out of 5 stars] - December 19, 2006
Subject: Uhh
Joseph Cotten as Dr. Frankenstein creates a rampaging killing machine. His daughter gives new meaning to wanting a man for his mind and outdoes her dad. Enraged villagers do their thing. I've seen worse, much worse Frankenstein movies. This should be OK for teenagers to watch, but their is female nudity and the potentially shocking murder of a mother and father in front of their very young son.

I downloaded the mpeg1 file. Color is so-so though the print is otherwise good. Audio is fine.

Reviewer: Arensky - [1.0 out of 5 stars] - December 15, 2006
Subject: Ugggggh
This is absolutely the bottom of the barrel. There's no thrills, no suspense, no shivers, and not much of a plot. Joseph Cotten must have really needed the money to sign up for this pitiful film. Oh, there's some skin, but not enough to justify a download. Besides, you can see that in the thumbnails. This movie gives the word "pathetic" a whole new meaning.

Reviewer: jimelena - [1.0 out of 5 stars] - December 13, 2006
Subject: Worst
You may remember this movie from the suckiest movie of the year awards 1971.
I don't know why they bothered.
Maybe Joseph Cotten needed some fast cash.


Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)